What to Do About Bad or Empty Search Results Before They Cost You a Deal
Do Empty Search Results Hurt as Much as Bad Ones?
A single bad review or an outdated news mention isn't automatically disqualifying, but paired with nothing else on the page to balance it out, it becomes the whole story. An empty results page does something similar: it leaves whoever's checking with no information at all, which reads as either invisibility or something to be curious about.
Both scenarios put the reader in charge of filling in the blanks, and people tend to fill blanks with the least generous interpretation available. A thin or negative page doesn't need to prove anything, it just needs to be the only thing there.
Can You Remove Bad Search Results?
Most executives' first instinct is to try to get something taken down. In practice, that's slow, often impossible, and sometimes makes a minor issue look more serious than it is, a legal takedown request can itself become a story if the original piece gets any attention. The more reliable lever is what shows up around it, Google ranks by relevance and authority, and a thin negative result gets buried under enough newer, stronger content.
This isn't a workaround, it's how search results actually behave. Ranking is a competition for the top of the page, not a permanent record of every result that ever existed, and the content that wins that competition today isn't necessarily the content that wins it in six months.
What Actually Improves Your Search Results?
Fresh coverage on high-authority outlets outranks older, weaker content almost every time. A recent MSN feature, a CNBC segment, or a Bloomberg mention will typically sit above a years-old negative post within the first page of results once it's indexed, largely because search engines weight domain authority and recency heavily when the underlying content is topically similar.
The goal isn't erasing the past, it's making sure it isn't the loudest thing in the room when someone checks you out today. A well-placed article doesn't argue against the old one, it just gives the algorithm a better answer to surface first.
How Long Does It Take to See Results?
High-authority coverage can start appearing on the first page within weeks of publishing, especially for less competitive name searches. Fully pushing an old result further down usually takes a small handful of fresh, credible placements rather than just one, each additional piece of strong content adds more weight to the newer, better version of your search results.
This isn't a one-and-done fix. It's closer to maintenance: keep adding credible, recent content, and the older material naturally loses ground over time, the same way a single good workout doesn't fix fitness but a consistent pattern of them does.
What If the Bad Result Is Actually Fair?
Sometimes the negative result isn't a misunderstanding, it's a real mistake or a real dispute that happened. In that case the instinct to bury it entirely can backfire, if someone digs past the first page and finds nothing else about you, the buried item suddenly looks like the one honest thing in the search results.
The better approach is building a body of credible, current work that gives context, not concealment. A search result that shows a real track record alongside an old issue reads very differently than one that shows only the old issue standing alone.
What Does This Look Like Six Months In?
Picture an executive who searched their own name and found a five-year-old lawsuit mention sitting on page one, with nothing else around it. Over six months they add an MSN feature, a podcast interview turned into a written piece, and a couple of LinkedIn posts that get picked up and shared, each indexed and ranking on its own.
By the end of that stretch, the old mention has typically dropped to page two, still technically findable if someone digs, but no longer the first thing anyone sees. That's the realistic outcome, not a guarantee that it disappears, but a real shift in what a casual searcher encounters first. The executive in this scenario didn't do anything to the old lawsuit mention directly, they simply gave Google better, more current material to rank ahead of it, which is the only lever that reliably works.
Compare packages and pricing
See All Media Packages
From a single MSN feature to full CNBC and Bloomberg placements plus a month of content, compare what's included at every tier, side by side.
